|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation: outcomes after maximal stent therapy显示文摘 | Ting-Hui Hsieh Kristin L. Mekeel Michael D. Crowell Cuong C. Nguyen Ananya Das Bashar A. Aqel Elizabeth J. Carey Thomas J. Byrne Hugo E. Vargas David D. Douglas David C. Mulligan M. Edwyn Harrison | 2013 | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2013，，1： | 3 |
| 2 | Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after deceased donor liver transplantation: outcomes after maximal stent therapy显示文摘 | Shabana F. Pasha M. Edwyn Harrison Ananya Das Cuong C. Nguyen Hugo E. Vargas Vijayan Balan Thomas J. Byrne David D. Douglas David C. Mulligan | 2007 | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2007，，1： | 2 |
| 3 | Agreement and conversion formula between mini-mental state examination and montreal cognitive assessment in an outpatient sample显示文摘AIM To explore the agreement between the mini-mental state examination(MMSE) and montreal cognitive assessment(Mo CA) within community dwelling older patients attending an old age psychiatry service and to derive and test a conversion formula between the two scales.METHODS Prospective study of consecutive patients attending outpatient services.Both tests were administered by the same researcher on the same day in random order.RESULTS The total sample(n = 135) was randomly divided into two groups.One to derive a conversion rule(n = 70),and a second(n = 65) in which this rule was tested.The agreement(Pearson's r) of MMSE and Mo CA was 0.86(P < 0.001),and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient(CCC) was 0.57(95%CI:0.45-0.66).In the second sample Mo CA scores were converted to MMSE scores according to a conversion rule from the first sample which achieved agreement with the original MMSE scoresof 0.89(Pearson's r,P < 0.001) and CCC of 0.88(95%CI:0.82-0.92).CONCLUSION Although the two scales overlap considerably,the agreement is modest.The conversion rule derived herein demonstrated promising accuracy and warrants further testing in other populations. | Luqman Helmi David Meagher Edmond O'Mahony Donagh O'Neill Owen Mulligan Sutha Murthy Geraldine McCarthy Dimitrios Adamis | 2016 | World Journal of Psychiatry2016，6，3： | 2 |
| 4 | Measuring the particle size of a known distribution using the focused beam reflec- tance measurement technique 显示文摘 | David Greaves John Boxall James Mulligan | 2008 | Chemical Engineering Science2008，63，22： | 1 |
| 5 | Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after deceased donor liver transplantation: outcomes after maximal stent therapy显示文摘 | Shabana F. Pasha M. Edwyn Harrison Ananya Das Cuong C. Nguyen Hugo E. Vargas Vijayan Balan Thomas J. Byrne David D. Douglas David C. Mulligan | 2007 | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2007，，1： | 1 |
| 6 | Recent Advances in Liver Transplantation显示文摘 | Russell H. Wiesner Jorge Rakela Michael B. Ishitani David C. Mulligan James R. Spivey Jeffery L. Steers Ruud A.F. Krom | 2003 | Mayo Clinic Proceedings2003，，2： | 1 |
| 7 | Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: The impact of the MELD allocation policy显示文摘 | Russell H. Wiesner Richard B. Freeman David C. Mulligan | 2004 | Gastroenterology2004，，5： | 1 |
| 8 | A randomized, prospective, double-blinded evaluation of selective bowel decontamination in liver transplantation显示文摘 | Walter C. Hellinger Joseph D. Yao Salvador Alvarez Janis E. Blair John J. Cawley Carlos V. Paya Peter C. O’Brien James R. Spivey Rolland C. Dickson Denise M. Harnois David D. Douglas Christopher B. Hughes Justin H. Nguyen David C. Mulligan Jeffrey L. Stee | 2002 | Transplantation2002，，12： | 1 |
| 9 | Water and nutrient dynamics and tree growth显示文摘 | Sands R David R Mulligan | 1990 | Forest Ecology and Management1990，30，14： | 1 |
| 10 | Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer显示文摘 | Farhood Farjah Douglas E. Wood Michael S. Mulligan Bahirathan Krishnadasan Patrick J. Heagerty Rebecca Gaston Symons David R. Flum | 2009 | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2009，，6： | 1 |
| 11 | Nutritional Recommendations for the Management of Sarcopenia显示文摘 | John E. Morley Josep M. Argiles William J. Evans Shalender Bhasin David Cella Nicolaas E.P. Deutz Wolfram Doehner Ken C.H. Fearon Luigi Ferrucci Marc K. Hellerstein Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Herbert Lochs Neil MacDonald Kathleen Mulligan Maurizio Muscaritoli | 2010 | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association2010，，： | 1 |
| 12 | Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: Does Splenic Preservation Affect Outcomes?显示文摘 | Kristin L. Mekeel Adyr A. Moss Kunam S. Reddy David C. Mulligan Kristi L. Harold | 2011 | Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques2011，，5： | 1 |
| 13 | Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: Does Splenic Preservation Affect Outcomes?显示文摘 | Kristin L. Mekeel Adyr A. Moss Kunam S. Reddy David C. Mulligan Kristi L. Harold | 2011 | Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques2011，，5： | 1 |
| 14 | Reduction of sulfur dioxide with methane over selected transition metal sulfides显示文摘 | David J Mulligan Dimitrios Berk | 1989 | Ind Eng Chem Res1989，28，： | 1 |
| 15 | Model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) exception for hepatopulmonary syndrome显示文摘 | Michael B. Fallon David C. Mulligan Robert G. Gish Michael J. Krowka | 2006 | Liver Transpl2006，，3： | 1 |
| 16 | Significance of Proximal Biliary Dilatation in Patients with Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation显示文摘 | Shawn St. Peter Manuel I. Rodriquez-Davalos Hector M. Rodriguez-Luna Edwyn M. Harrison Adyr A. Moss David C. Mulligan | 2004 | Digestive Diseases and Sciences2004，，7： | 1 |
| 17 | A multicenter trial of an intrabronchial valve for treatment of severe emphysema显示文摘 | Douglas E. Wood Robert J. McKenna Roger D. Yusen Daniel H. Sterman David E. Ost Steven C. Springmeyer H. Xavier Gonzalez Michael S. Mulligan Thomas Gildea Ward V. Houck Michael Machuzak Atul C. Mehta | 2007 | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2007，，1： | 1 |
| 18 | A multicenter trial of an intrabronchial valve for treatment of severe emphysema显示文摘 | Douglas E. Wood Robert J. McKenna Roger D. Yusen Daniel H. Sterman David E. Ost Steven C. Springmeyer H. Xavier Gonzalez Michael S. Mulligan Thomas Gildea Ward V. Houck Michael Machuzak Atul C. Mehta | 2007 | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2007，，1： | 1 |
| 19 | A narrative review of the current and future role of robotic surgery in liver surgery and transplantation显示文摘Background:Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)is the technique of choice in selected patients for the treatment of liver tumors.The robotic approach is considered today the natural evolution of MIS.The application of the robotic technique in liver transplantation(LT)has been recently evaluated,especially in the living donation.The aim of this paper is to review the current role of the MIS and robotic donor hepatectomy in the literature and to evaluate the possible future implication in the transplant field.Methods:We conducted a narrative review using PubMed and Google Scholar for reports published so far,using the following keywords:minimally invasive liver surgery,laparoscopic liver surgery,robotic liver surgery,robotic living donation,laparoscopic donor hepatectomy and robotic donor hepatectomy.Results:Several advantages have been claimed in favor of robotic surgery:three-dimensional(3-D)imaging with stable and high-definition view;a more rapid learning curve than the laparoscopic one;the lack of hand tremors and the freedom of movements.Compared to open surgery,the benefits showed in the studies evaluating the robotic approach in the living donation are:less postoperative pain,the shorter period before returning to normal activity despite sustaining longer operation time.Furthermore,the 3-D and magnification view makes the technique excellent in distinguishing the right plane of transection,vascular and biliary anatomy,associated with high precision of the movements and a better bleeding control(essential for donor safety)and lower rate of vascular injury.Conclusions:The current literature does not fully support the superiority of the robotic approach versus laparoscopic or open method in living donor hepatectomy.Robotic donor hepatectomy performed by teams with high expertise and in properly selected living donors is safe and feasible.However,further data are necessary to evaluate properly the role of robotic surgery in the field of living donation. | Michele Finotti Francesco D’Amico David Mulligan Giuliano Testa | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，1： | 1 |
| 20 | A study of supported molybdenum catalysts for reduction of SO2 with CH4 : Effect of sulphidation method显示文摘 | David J Mulligan Kawai Tam Dimitrios Ber | 1995 | The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering1995，73，3： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员