维普中文期刊产品整合服务
3篇 您的检索式:作者名="Simon Yu Kit"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Earnings Quality: Some Evidence on the Role of Auditor Tenure and Auditors 'Industry Expertise' 显示文摘Gul Ferdinand A Fung Simon Yu Kit Jaggi Bikki 2009Journal of Accounting & Economics2009,47,03:1
2Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise显示文摘Ferdinand A. Gul Simon Yu Kit Fung Bikki Jaggi 2009Journal of Accounting and Economics2009,,3:1
3Multinational survey on the preferred approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus in the Asia-Pacific region显示文摘BACKGROUND Major societies provide differing guidance on management of Barrett’s esophagus(BE),making standardization challenging.AIM To evaluate the preferred diagnosis and management practices of BE among Asian endoscopists.METHODS Endoscopists from across Asia were invited to participate in an online questionnaire comprising eleven questions regarding diagnosis,surveillance and management of BE.RESULTS Five hundred sixty-nine of 1016(56.0%)respondents completed the survey,with most respondents from Japan(n=310,54.5%)and China(n=129,22.7%).Overall,the preferred endoscopic landmark of the esophagogastric junction was squamocolumnar junction(42.0%).Distal palisade vessels was preferred in Japan(59.0%vs 10.0%,P<0.001)while outside Japan,squamo-columnar junction was preferred(59.5%vs 27.4%,P<0.001).Only 16.3%of respondents used Prague C and M criteria all the time.It was never used by 46.1%of Japanese,whereas 84.2%outside Japan,endoscopists used it to varying extents(P<0.001).Most Asian endoscopists(70.8%)would survey long-segment BE without dysplasia every two years.Adherence to Seattle protocol was poor with only 6.3%always performing it.73.2%of Japanese never did it,compared to 19.3%outside Japan(P<0.001).The most preferred(74.0%)treatment of non-dysplastic BE was proton pump inhibitor only when the patient was symptomatic or had esophagitis.For BE with low-grade dysplasia,6-monthly surveillance was preferred in 61.9%within Japan vs 47.9%outside Japan(P<0.001).CONCLUSION Diagnosis and management of BE varied within Asia,with stark contrast between Japan and outside Japan.Most Asian endoscopists chose squamo-columnar junction to be the landmark for esophagogastric junction,which is incorrect.Most also did not consistently use Prague criteria,and Seattle protocol.Lack of standardization,education and research are possible reasons.Guan Sen Kew Alex Yu Sen Soh Yeong Yeh Lee Takuji Gotoda Yan-Qing Li Yan Zhang Yiong Huak Chan Kewin Tien Ho Siah Daniel Tong Simon Ying Kit Law Andrew Ruszkiewicz Ping-Huei Tseng Yi-Chia Lee Chi-Yang Chang Duc Trong Quach Chika Kusano Shobna Bhatia Justin Che-Yuen Wu Rajvinder Singh Prateek Sharma Khek-Yu Ho 2021World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology2021,13,4:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费