维普中文期刊产品整合服务
8篇 您的检索式:作者名="Andrew Ruszkiewicz"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Serrated neoplasia of the colorectum显示文摘Serrated polyps of the colorectum form a group of related lesions which include aberrant crypt foci (ACF), conventional hyperplastic polyps, mixed (admixed) polyps, serrated adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas. In recent years the molecular differences between these morphologically similar lesions have been highlighted, and their differing biological potential has been realised. In particular, the sessile serrated adenoma has become recognised as the precursor lesion to a group of sporadic colorectal carcinomas characterised by morphological and molecular features distinct from conventional adenomas. These recent findings have challenged the long held paradigm that all colorectal carcinomas arise via the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence. In addition, they present a major challenge for the early detection and management of colorectal cancer, which is no longer regarded as a homogeneous entity.Nathan T Harvey Andrew Ruszkiewicz 2007World Journal of Gastroenterology2007,13,28:4
2Randomised controlled trial comparing modified Sano's and narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classifications for colorectal lesions显示文摘AIM To assess the utility of modified Sano′s(MS) vs thenarrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic(NICE) classification in differentiating colorectal polyps.METHODS Patients undergoing colonoscopy between 2013 and 2015 were enrolled in this trial.Based on the MS or the NICE classifications,patients were randomised for real-time endoscopic diagnosis.This was followed by biopsies,endoscopic or surgical resection.The endoscopic diagnosis was then compared to the final(blinded) histopathology.The primary endpoint was the sensitivity(Sn),specificity(Sp),positive predictive value(PPV) and negative predictive value(NPV) of differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps(MSⅡ/Ⅱo/Ⅲa/Ⅲb vs I or NICE 1 vs 2/3).The secondary endpoints were 'endoscopic resectability'(MSⅡ/Ⅱo/Ⅲa vs Ⅰ/Ⅲb or NICE 2 vs 1/3),NPV for diminutive distal adenomas and prediction of post-polypectomy surveillance intervals.RESULTS A total of 348 patients were evaluated.The Sn,Sp,PPV and NPV in differentiating neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps were,98.9%,85.7%,98.2% and 90.9% for MS;and 99.1%,57.7%,95.4% and 88.2% for NICE,respectively.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC) for MS was 0.92(95%CI:0.86-0.98);and AUC for NICE was 0.78(95%CI:0.69,0.88).The Sn,Sp,PPV and NPV in predicting 'endoscopic resectability' were 98.9%,86.1%,97.8% and 92.5% for MS;and 98.6%,66.7%,94.7% and 88.9% for NICE,respectively.The AUC for MS was 0.92(95%CI:0.87-0.98);and the AUC for NICE was 0.83(95%CI:0.75-0.90).The AUC values were statistically different for both comparisons(P = 0.0165 and P = 0.0420,respectively).The accuracy for diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp(SSA/P) with high confidence utilizing MS classification was 93.2%.The differentiation of SSA/P from other lesions achieved Sp,Sn,PPV and NPV of 87.2%,91.5%,89.6% and 98.6%,respectively.The NPV for predicting adenomas in diminutive rectosigmoid polyps(n = 150) was 96.6% and 95% with MS and NICE respectively.The calculated accuracy of post-polypectomy surveillance for MS group was 98.2%(167 out of 170) and for NICE group was 92.1%(139 out of 151).CONCLUSION The MS classification outperformed the NICE classification in differentiating neoplastic polyps and predicting endoscopic resectability.Both classifications met ASGE PIVI thresholds.Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao Pu Kuan Loong Cheong Doreen Siew Ching Koay Sze Pheh Yeap Amanda Ovenden Mahima Raju Andrew Ruszkiewicz Philip W Chiu James Y Lau Rajvinder Singh 2018World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2018,10,9:4
3Real-time histology with the endocytoscope显示文摘Endoscopic Imaging has progressed tremendously over the last few decades. Novel imaging technologies such as high-resolution and high-magnification white light endoscopy, narrow band imaging, optimal band imaging, auto? ourescence imaging and optical coherence tomography not only aid the endoscopist in detecting malignant or pre-malignant lesions but also assist in predicting histology. Recently, the introduction of Endocytoscopy (EC) and Confocal Endomicroscopy has taken us into a new realm of diagnostic endoscopy. With the ability to magnify up to 1000 ×, cellular structures can be visualized in real-time. This advance in technology could potentially lead to a paradigm shift negating the need to obtain biopsies. EC is, however, still in the early stages of development and further research needs to be carried out before it can be accepted as standard practice. This review will focus on the diagnostic utility of the Endocytoscope.Rajvinder Singh Swee Lin Chen Yi Mei William Tam Devinder Raju Andrew Ruszkiewicz 2010World Journal of Gastroenterology2010,16,40:3
4Methylation of TIMP3 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma显示文摘AIM: To measure the frequency of DNA methylation of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) promoter and relate this to any change of gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients from a region of high incidence in China.METHODS: Cancer cell lines were treated with or without the demethylating reagent 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine. Methylation of the TIMP3 promoter was assessed in three regions by melt curve analysis and its expression was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. Tumors and proximal resection margins were obtained from 64 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from a region of high incidence in China. Methylation was assessed by melt curve analysis and expression by immunohistochemistry.RESULTS: Methylation in one of the three promoter regions assessed correlated with gene silencing in esophageal cell lines. A degree of methylation of TIMP3 was found in only four esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, and partial loss of TIMP3 protein expression in just one.CONCLUSION: Methylation and loss of expression of TIMP3 occurs infrequently in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a region of high incidence in China.Eric Smith Neville J De Young Zi-Qiang Tian Maria Caruso Andrew R Ruszkiewicz Jun-Feng Liu Glyn G Jamieson Paul A Drew 2008World Journal of Gastroenterology2008,14,2:2
5Claudin-1 Expression Is Elevated in Colorectal Cancer Precursor Lesions Harboring the BRAF V600E Mutation显示文摘Maria Caruso Kim Y.C. Fung James Moore Gemma V. Brierley Leah J. Cosgrove Michelle Thomas Glenice Cheetham Emma Brook Louise M. Fraser Teresa Tin Ha Tran Andrew Ruszkiewicz 2014Translational Oncology2014,,:1
6Rising incidence of early‐onset colorectal cancer in A ustralia over two decades: Report and review显示文摘Joanne P Young Aung Ko Win Christophe Rosty Ingrid Flight David Roder Graeme P Young Oliver Frank Graeme K Suthers Peter J Hewett Andrew Ruszkiewicz Ehud Hauben Barbara‐Ann Adelstein Susan Parry Amanda Townsend Jennifer E Hardingham Timothy J Price 2015J Gastroenterol Hepatol2015,,:1
7Multinational survey on the preferred approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus in the Asia-Pacific region显示文摘BACKGROUND Major societies provide differing guidance on management of Barrett’s esophagus(BE),making standardization challenging.AIM To evaluate the preferred diagnosis and management practices of BE among Asian endoscopists.METHODS Endoscopists from across Asia were invited to participate in an online questionnaire comprising eleven questions regarding diagnosis,surveillance and management of BE.RESULTS Five hundred sixty-nine of 1016(56.0%)respondents completed the survey,with most respondents from Japan(n=310,54.5%)and China(n=129,22.7%).Overall,the preferred endoscopic landmark of the esophagogastric junction was squamocolumnar junction(42.0%).Distal palisade vessels was preferred in Japan(59.0%vs 10.0%,P<0.001)while outside Japan,squamo-columnar junction was preferred(59.5%vs 27.4%,P<0.001).Only 16.3%of respondents used Prague C and M criteria all the time.It was never used by 46.1%of Japanese,whereas 84.2%outside Japan,endoscopists used it to varying extents(P<0.001).Most Asian endoscopists(70.8%)would survey long-segment BE without dysplasia every two years.Adherence to Seattle protocol was poor with only 6.3%always performing it.73.2%of Japanese never did it,compared to 19.3%outside Japan(P<0.001).The most preferred(74.0%)treatment of non-dysplastic BE was proton pump inhibitor only when the patient was symptomatic or had esophagitis.For BE with low-grade dysplasia,6-monthly surveillance was preferred in 61.9%within Japan vs 47.9%outside Japan(P<0.001).CONCLUSION Diagnosis and management of BE varied within Asia,with stark contrast between Japan and outside Japan.Most Asian endoscopists chose squamo-columnar junction to be the landmark for esophagogastric junction,which is incorrect.Most also did not consistently use Prague criteria,and Seattle protocol.Lack of standardization,education and research are possible reasons.Guan Sen Kew Alex Yu Sen Soh Yeong Yeh Lee Takuji Gotoda Yan-Qing Li Yan Zhang Yiong Huak Chan Kewin Tien Ho Siah Daniel Tong Simon Ying Kit Law Andrew Ruszkiewicz Ping-Huei Tseng Yi-Chia Lee Chi-Yang Chang Duc Trong Quach Chika Kusano Shobna Bhatia Justin Che-Yuen Wu Rajvinder Singh Prateek Sharma Khek-Yu Ho 2021World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology2021,13,4:0
8Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic oesophagitis: What is the relationship?显示文摘Eosinophilic oesophagitis(EoE) and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease(GORD) are the most common causes of chronic oesophagitis and dysphagia associated with oesophageal mucosal eosinophilia. Distinguishing between the two is imperative but challenging due to overlapping clinical and histological features. A diagnosis of EoE requires clinical, histological and endoscopic correlation whereas a diagnosis of GORD is mainly clinical without the need for other investigations. Both entities may exhibit oesophageal eosinophilia at a similar level making a histological distinction between them difficult. Although the term proton-pump inhibitor responsive oesophageal eosinophilia has recently been retracted from the guidelines, a relationship between Eo E and GORD still exists. This relationship is complex as they may coexist, either interacting bidirectionally or are unrelated. This review aims to outline the differences and potential relationship between the two conditions, with specific focus on histology, immunology, pathogenesis and treatment.Stephanie Wong Andrew Ruszkiewicz Richard H Holloway Nam Q Nguyen 2018World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology2018,9,3:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费