|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | A tale of worldwide success:Behind the scenes of Carex(Cyperaceae)biogeography and diversification显示文摘The megadiverse genus Carex(c.2000 species,Cyperaceae)has a nearly cosmopolitan distribution,displaying an inverted latitudinal richness gradient with higher species diversity in cold-temperate areas of the Northern Hemisphere.Despite great expansion in our knowledge of the phylogenetic history of the genus and many molecular studies focusing on the biogeography of particular groups during the last few decades,a global analysis of Carex biogeography and diversification is still lacking.For this purpose,we built the hitherto most comprehensive Carex-dated phylogeny based on three markers(ETS-ITS-matK),using a previous phylogenomic Hyb-Seq framework,and a sampling of two-thirds of its species and all recognized sections.Ancestral area reconstaiction,biogeographic stochastic mapping,and diversification rate analyses were conducted to elucidate macroevolutionary biogeographic and diversification patterns.Our results reveal that Carex originated in the late Eocene in E Asia,where it probably remained until the synchronous diversification of its main subgeneric lineages during the late Oligocene.E Asia is supported as the cradle of Carex diversification,as well as a< | Santiago Martin-Bravo Pedro Jimenez-Mejias Tamara Villaverde Marcial Escudero Marlene Hahn Daniel Spalink Eric H.Roalson Andrew L.Hipp the Global Carex Group Carmen Benitez-Benitez Leo P.Bruederle Elisabeth Fitzek Bruce A.Ford Kerry A.Ford Mira Gamer Sebastian Gebauer Matthias H.Hoffmann Xiao-Feng Jin Isabel Larridon Etienne Ldveilld-Bourret Yi-Fei Lu Modesto Luceno Enrique Maguilla Jose Ignacio Marquez-Corro Monica Miguez Robert Naczi Anton A.Reznicek Julian R.Starr | 2019 | Journal of Systematics and Evolution2019，57，6： | 6 |
| 2 | A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles显示文摘Phylogenetic studies of Carex L.(Cyperaceae)have consistently demonstrated that most subgenera and sections are para-or polyphyletic.Yet,taxonomists continue to use subgenera and sections in Carex classification.Why?The Global Carex Group(GCG)here takes the position that the historical and continued use of subgenera and sections serves to(i)organize our understanding of lineages in Carex,(ii)create an identification mechanism to break the~2000 species of Carex into manageable groups and stimulate its study,and(iii)provide a framework to recognize morphologically diagnosable lineages within Carex.Unfortunately,the current understanding of phylogenetic relationships in Carex is not yet sufficient for a global reclassification of the genus within a Linnean infrageneric(sectional)framework.Rather than leaving Carex classification in its current state,which is misleading and confusing,we here take the intermediate steps of implementing the recently revised subgeneric classification and using a combination of informally named clades and formally named sections to reflect the current state of our knowledge.This hybrid classification framework is presented in an order corresponding to a linear arrangement of the clades on a ladderized phylogeny,largely based on the recent phylogenies published by the GCG.It organizes Carex into six subgenera,which are,in turn,subdivided into 62 formally named Linnean sections plus 49 informal groups.This framework will serve as a roadmap for research on Carex phylogeny,enabling further development of a complete reclassification by presenting relevant morphological and geographical information on clades where possible and standardizing the use of formal sectional names. | Eric H.Roalson Pedro Jiménez-Mejías Andrew L.Hipp Carmen Benítez-Benítez Leo P.Bruederle Kyong-Sook Chung Marcial Escudero Bruce A.Ford Kerry Ford Sebastian Gebauer Berit Gehrke Marlene Hahn Muhammad Qasim Hayat Mathias H.Hoffmann Xiao-Feng Jin Sangtae Kim Isabel Larridon Étienne Léveillé-Bourret Yi-Fei Lu Modesto Luceño Enrique Maguilla Jose IgnacioMárquez-Corro Santiago Martín-Bravo Tomomi Masaki Mónica Míguez Robert F.C.Naczi Anton A.Reznicek Daniel Spalink Julian R.Starr Uzma Tamara Villaverde Marcia J.Waterway Karen L.Wilson and Shu-Ren Zhang | 2021 | Journal of Systematics and Evolution2021，59，4： | 3 |
| 3 | Targeted sequencing supports morphology and embryo features in resolving the classification of Cyperaceae tribe Fuireneae s.l.显示文摘Molecular phylogenetic studies based on Sanger sequences have shown that Cyperaceae tribe Fuireneae s.l.is paraphyletic.However,taxonomic sampling in these studies has been poor,topologies have been inconsistent,and support for the backbone of trees has been weak.Moreover,uncertainty still surrounds the morphological limits of Schoenoplectiella,a genus of mainly small,amphicarpic annuals that was recently segregated from Schoenoplectus.Consequently,despite ample evidence from molecular analyses that Fuireneae s.l.might consist of two to four tribal lineages,no taxonomic changes have yet been made.Here,we use the Angiosperms353 enrichment panel for targeted sequencing to(i)clarify the relationships of Fuireneae s.l.with the related tribes Abildgaardieae,Eleocharideae,and Cypereae;(ii)define the limits of Fuireneae s.s.,and(iii)test the monophyly of Fuireneae s.l.genera with emphasis on Schoenoplectus and Schoenoplectiella.Using more than a third of Fuireneae s.l.diversity,our phylogenomic analyses strongly support six genera and four major Fuireneae s.l.clades that we recognize as tribes:Bolboschoeneae stat.nov.,Fuireneae s.s.,Schoenoplecteae,and Pseudoschoeneae tr.nov.These results are consistent with morphological,micromorphological(nutlet epidermal cell shape),and embryo differences detected for each tribe.At the generic level,most sub-Saharan African perennials currently treated in Schoenoplectus are transferred to Schoenoplectiella.Our targeted sequencing results show that these species are nested in Schoenoplectiella,and their treatment here is consistent with micromorphological and embryo characters shared by all Schoenoplectiella species.Keys to recognized tribes and genera are provided. | Julian R.Starr Pedro Jiménez-Mejías Alexandre R.Zuntini Étienne Léveillé-Bourret Ilias Semmouri Muthama Muasya William J.Baker Grace E.Brewer Niroshini Epitawalage Isabel Fairlie Félix Forest Izai A.B.Sabino Kikuchi Lisa Pokorny Isabel Larridon | 2021 | Journal of Systematics and Evolution2021，59，4： | 1 |
| 4 | A new classification of Cyperaceae (Poales) supported by phylogenomic data显示文摘Cyperaceae(sedges)are the third largest monocot family and are of considerable economic and ecological importance.Sedges represent an ideal model family to study evolutionary biology due to their species richness,global distribution,large discrepancies in lineage diversity,broad range of ecological preferences,and adaptations including multiple origins of C4 photosynthesis and holocentric chromosomes.Goetghebeur′s seminal work on Cyperaceae published in 1998 provided the most recent complete classification at tribal and generic level,based on a morphological study of Cyperaceae inflorescence,spikelet,flower,and embryo characters,plus anatomical and other information.Since then,several family-level molecular phylogenetic studies using Sanger sequence data have been published.Here,more than 20 years after the last comprehensive classification of the family,we present the first family-wide phylogenomic study of Cyperaceae based on targeted sequencing using the Angiosperms353 probe kit sampling 311 accessions.In addition,62 accessions available from GenBank were mined for overlapping reads and included in the phylogenomic analyses.Informed by this backbone phylogeny,a new classification for the family at the tribal,subtribal,and generic levels is proposed.The majority of previously recognized suprageneric groups are supported,and for the first time,we establish support for tribe Cryptangieae as a clade including the genus Koyamaea.We provide a taxonomic treatment including identification keys and diagnoses for the 2 subfamilies,24 tribes,and 10 subtribes,and basic information on the 95 genera.The classification includes five new subtribes in tribe Schoeneae:Anthelepidinae,Caustiinae,Gymnoschoeninae,Lepidospermatinae,and Oreobolinae. | Isabel Larridon Alexandre R.Zuntini Étienne Léveillé-Bourret Russell L.Barrett Julian R.Starr AMuthama Muasya Tamara Villaverde Kenneth Bauters Grace E.Brewer Jeremy J.Bruhl Suzana M.Costa Tammy L.Elliott Niroshini Epitawalage Marcial Escudero Isabel Fairlie Paul Goetghebeur Andrew LHipp Pedro Jiménez-Mejías Izai ABSabino Kikuchi Modesto Luceño JoséIgnacio Márquez-Corro Santiago Martín-Bravo Olivier Maurin Lisa Pokorny Eric HRoalson Ilias Semmouri David A.Simpson Daniel Spalink WWayt Thomas Karen L.Wilson Martin Xanthos Félix Forest William J.Baker | 2021 | Journal of Systematics and Evolution2021，59，4： | 1 |
| 5 | Cyperaceae in a data-rich era: New evolutionary insights from solid frameworks显示文摘Cyperaceae are among the 10 most diverse angiosperm families and the third largest among monocots(Christenhusz & Byng,2016),with a critical ecological role in wetlands and in high-latitude and high-elevation ecosystems.Sedges represent an ideal model plant family to study evolutionary biology because of their species richness,global distribution,large discrepancies in lineage diversity,broad range of ecological preferences,and adaptations including multiple origins of C4 photosynthesis and holocentric chromosomes(Larridon et al.,2021a). | Pedro Jimenez-Mejias Isabel Larridon | 2021 | Journal of Systematics and Evolution2021，59，4： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员