|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | FAIR Principles:Interpretations and Implementation Considerations显示文摘The FAIR principles have been widely cited,endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016.By intention,the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations,but provide guidance for improving Findability,Accessibility,Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources.This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles,because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions.However,it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations.Thus,while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways,for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and(re)-usable.We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible,robust,widespread and consistent FAIR implementations.Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations,or when they spot a gap,accept the challenge to create the needed solution,which,ideally,can be used again by other communities in the future.Here,we provide interpretations and implementation considerations(choices and challenges)for each FAIR principle. | Annika Jacobsen Ricardo de Miranda Azevedo Nick Juty Dominique Batista Simon Coles Ronald Cornet Melanie Courtot Merce Crosas Michel Dumontier Chris T.Evelo Carole Goble Giancarlo Guizzardi Karsten Kryger Hansen Ali Hasnain Kristina Hettne Jaap Heringa Rob W.W.Hooft Melanie Imming Keith G.Jeffery Rajaram Kaliyaperumal Martijn GKersloot Christine R.Kirkpatrick Tobias Kuhn Ignasi Labastida Barbara Magagna PeterMcQuilton Natalie Meyers Annalisa Montesanti Mirjam van Reisen Philippe Rocca-Serra Robert Pergl Susanna-Assunta Sansone Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos Juliane Schneider George Strawn Mark Thompson Andra Waagmeester Tobias Weigel Mark D.Wilkinson Egon L.Willighagen Peter Wittenburg Marco Roos Barend Mons Erik Schultes | 2020 | Data Intelligence2020，2，1： | 26 |
| 2 | 鼻阻塞的主观评价与客观鼻测量的相关性研究显示文摘目的探讨鼻阻塞时检查者和患者的主观评价与客观鼻测量之间是否有相关性。方法检查者和患者均采用视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)对鼻阻塞程度进行评价。客观鼻测量采用主动后鼻测压仪和鼻声反射测量仪进行。以配对t检验分析检查者的临床评价和患者VAS均数的差异,以Spearman等级相关分析评价客观鼻测量结果单侧鼻气流阻力与单侧鼻道容积、单侧鼻腔最小横截面积的关系,以及检查者的临床评价、患者VAS与上述客观鼻测量结果的相关性。结果本组病例经统计学分析,316例患者中,减充血前后单侧鼻气流阻力与单侧鼻道容积、单侧鼻腔最小横截面积间呈负相关(r值分别为-0.430、-0.554、-0.373、-0.600,P值均〈0.001)。减充血前后,检查者的临床评价与患者VAS均数呈正相关,差异均有统计学意义(r值分别为0.630、0.526,P值均〈0.001),二者均与鼻气流阻力有一定的正相关关系(减充血前:检查者的临床评价与鼻气流阻力r=0.530,P=0.000,患者VAS与鼻气流阻力r=0.351,P=0.000;减充血后:检查者的临床评价与鼻气流阻力r=0.452,P=0.000,患者VAS与鼻气流阻力r=0.216,P=0.000),与鼻道容积和鼻腔最小横截面积均有一定的负相关关系(减充血前:检查者的临床评价与鼻道容积r=-0.411,P=0.000,患者VAS与鼻道容积r=-0.325,P=0.000,检查者的临床评价与鼻腔最小横截面积r=-0.507,P=0.000,患者VAS与鼻腔最小横截面积r=-0.384,P=0.000;减充血后:检查者的临床评价与鼻道容积r=-0.391,P=0.000,患者VAS与鼻道容积r=-0.209,P=0.000,检查者的临床评价与鼻腔最小横截面积r=-0.471,P=0.000,患者VAS与鼻腔最小横截面积r=-0.286,P=0.000)。检查者的临床评价与客观鼻测量参数的相关系数大于患者VAS与客观鼻测量参数的相关系数。结论鼻阻力测压与鼻声反射测量的结果有一定的相关性。检查者的临床评价与患者VAS存在一定的正相关关系。两者均与客观鼻测量参数存在一定的直线相关关系。 | 张革化 Ronald S. Fenton Richard Rival Philip Solomon Philip Cole 李源 | 2008 | 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志2008，43，7： | 14 |
| 3 | 鼻阻力测压与鼻声反射测量的相关性研究显示文摘目的探讨主动后鼻阻力测压仪的参数——鼻阻力(nasal resistance,NR)与鼻声反射测量仪的参数——鼻腔容积(nasal cavity volume,NV)、鼻腔最小横截面积(minimal cross sectional area,MCSA)间是否具有相关性。方法应用主动后鼻阻力测压法和鼻声反射测量法对316例有鼻阻塞的患者进行前瞻性研究。根据减充血前双侧鼻阻力(bilateral NR,BNR)将患者分为2组,组1:BNR减充血前≤0.25 Pa/cm^3·s,组2:BNR减充血前>0.25 Pa/cm^3·s。Spearman等级相关分析研究上述两种客观测量法的参数在全体研究对象及各组中的相关性。结果在使用减充血剂前、后,316例患者单侧鼻阻力(unilateral NR,UNR)与单侧鼻腔容积(unilateral NV,UNV)、单侧鼻腔最小横截面积(unilateral MCSA,UMCSA)间均存在显著性负相关(P值均=0.000);组1(104例)和组2(212例)在减充血前、后的UNR与UNV、UMCSA间均存在显著性负相关(P值均=0.000)。鼻阻力与鼻腔最小横截面积的相关系数均大于鼻阻力与鼻气道容积的相关系数。结论在有鼻阻塞的患者中,NR、NV及MCSA存在负相关,MCSA是影响NR的主要因素。 | 张革化 李源 Ronald S Fenton Philip Cole Richard Rival Philip Solomon | 2008 | 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科2008，15，10： | 8 |
| 4 | Automatic assessment of expressive oral reading显示文摘 | Daniel Bola?os Ronald A. Cole Wayne H. Ward Gerald A. Tindal Paula J. Schwanenflugel Melanie R. Kuhn | 2013 | Speech Communication2013，，2： | 1 |
| 5 | Effect ofAspergillus parasiticus soil inoculum on invasion of peanut seeds显示文摘 | Bruce W. Horn Joe W. Dorner Ronald L. Greene Paul D. Blankenship Richard J. Cole | 1994 | Mycopathologia1994，，3： | 1 |
| 6 | Environmental load distributions:influence of platform configuration显示文摘 | Beverley F Ronalds Stephen Trinh Geoffrey K Cole | 2003 | Journal of Constructional Steel Research2003，59，2： | 1 |
| 7 | Basalt-rhyolite volcanism by MORB-continental crust interaction: Nd, Sr-isotopic and geochemical evidence from southern San Joaquin Basin, California显示文摘 | Mukul Sharma Asish R. Basu Ronald B. Cole Peter G. DeCelles | 1991 | Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology1991，，2： | 1 |
| 8 | The Interaction Between Strength and Fatigue Reliability for a Minimum Structure in Shallow Water显示文摘 | Cole G K Ronalds B F Fakas E | 2003 | Journal of Offshore Mechanics & Arctic Engineering2003，125，4： | 1 |
| 9 | The Interaction Between Strength and Fatigue Reliability for a Minimum Structure in Shallow Water显示文摘 | Cole G K Ronalds B F Fakas E | 2003 | Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering NOVEMBER2003，125，： | 1 |
| 10 | 初始俯冲岩浆的地球化学和锆石Hf-O同位素制约显示文摘板块俯冲起始是全球板块构造最不为人所知的关键过程之一.岛弧型岩浆岩和变质岩为研究成熟阶段的俯冲过程提供了有效制约,但俯冲初期或起始阶段形成的岩浆岩却知之甚少,严重制约了人类对全球板块构造如何启动的认知.针对这一问题,我们对长期经历大洋板块俯冲的阿拉斯加进行详细野外考察,选择有可能代表俯冲初期至成熟阶段的中生代岩体进行了系统同位素年代学和地球化学研究.结果表明,这些样品都具有典型的岛弧岩浆的地球化学特征,但晚三叠世岩石具有亏损Hf-Nd同位素、低于地幔值的O同位素和高的锆石饱和温度,明显区别于俯冲成熟阶段的岩浆岩,提出其来源于俯冲初期俯冲板块中高温热液蚀变辉长岩的部分熔融.这一发现为研究俯冲起始开辟了新的途径,将对全球板块构造的起始和大陆地壳的形成等研究产生重要影响. | 杨进辉 王浩 钟孙霖 朱昱升 Ronald Cole | 2021 | Science Bulletin2021，66，10： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员