维普中文期刊产品整合服务
19篇 您的检索式:作者名="Markars R"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following colorectal surgery:Systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To provide a specifi c review and meta-analysis of the available evidence for continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following midline laparoto-my for major colorectal surgery. METHODS: Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings and article reference lists were searched to identify randomised, controlled trials of continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were opioid consumption, pain visual analogue scores (VASs), return to bowel function and length of hospital stay. Weighted mean difference were calculated for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Five trials containing 542 laparotomy wounds were eligible for inclusion. There was a sig- nificant decrease in post-operative pain VAS at rest on day 3 (weighted mean difference: -0.43; 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.04; P = 0.03) but not on post-operative day 1 and 2. Local anaesthetic infusion was associated with a signifi cant reduction in pain VAS on movement on all three post-operative days (day 1 weighted mean difference: -1.14; 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.041; P = 0.04, day 2 weighted mean difference: -0.97, 95% CI: -1.91to -0.029; P = 0.04, day 3 weighted mean difference: -0.61; 95% CI: 1.01 to -0.20; P = 0.0038). Local an- aesthetic wound infusion was associated with a signifi - cant decrease in total opioid consumption (weighted mean difference: -40.13; 95% CI: -76.74 to -3.53; P = 0.03). There was no signifi cant decrease in length of stay (weighted mean difference: -20.87; 95% CI: -46.96 to 5.21; P = 0.12) or return of bowel function (weighted mean difference: -9.40; 95% CI: -33.98 to 15.17; P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic re- view and meta-analysis suggest that local anaesthetic wound infusion following laparotomy for major color- ectal surgery is a promising technique but do not pro- vide conclusive evidence of benefi t. Further research is required including cost-effectiveness analysis.Alan Karthikesalingam Stewart R Walsh Sheraz R Markar Umar Sadat Tjun Y Tang Charles M Malata 2008World Journal of Gastroenterology2008,14,34:4
2Point-of-care testing in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers: Current technology and future directions显示文摘Point-of-care(POC) tests enable rapid results and are well established in medical practice.Recent advances in analytical techniques have led to a new generation of POC devices that will alter gastrointestinal diagnostic pathways.This review aims to identify current and newtechnologies for the POC diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer.A structured search of the Embase and Medline databases was performed.Papers reporting diagnostic tests for gastrointestinal cancer available as a POC device or containing a description of feasibility for POC application were included.Studies recovered were heterogeneous and therefore results are presented as a narrative review.Six diagnostic methods were identified(fecal occult blood, fecal proteins, volatile organic compounds, pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2, tumour markers and DNA analysis).Fecal occult blood testing has a reported sensitivity of 66%-85% and specificity greater than 95%.The others are at a range of development and clinical application.POC devices have a proven role in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer.Barriers to their implementation exist and the transition from experimental to clinical medicine is currently slow.New technologies demonstrate potential to provide accurate POC tests and an ability to diagnose gastrointestinal cancer at an early stage with improved clinical outcome and survival.Jeremy R Huddy Melody Z Ni Sheraz R Markar George B Hanna 2015World Journal of Gastroenterology2015,21,14:2
3急性上消化道出血显示文摘每年,每10万人中就有约100例发生上消化道(食道、胃和十二指肠)出血“。这是一个具有较高病死率的内科急症。2007年英国的一项调査发现,上消化道出血的总病死率为10%。消化性溃疡是上消化道出血最常见的原因(框图1),这一实践指南为上消化道出血的初期处理以及消化性溃疡出血的后续管理提供了指导。Emma Sverden Sheraz R Markar Lars Agreus Jesper Lagergren 龚亮(译) 吴东(校) 2019英国医学杂志中文版2019,22,7:1
4Systematic review and pooled analysis assessing the association between elder- ly age and outcome following siJrgcl resection of esophageal ma- lignancy显示文摘Markars R Karthikesalirtgam A Thrumurhy S 2012Dis EsoPhagus2012,26,3:1
5Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children 显示文摘Markar SR Blackburn S Cobb R 2012J Gastrointest Surg2012,16,10:1
6Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population显示文摘Grailey K Markar S R Karthikesalingam A 2013Surg Endosc2013,27,1:1
7Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and un- complicated appendicitis in children显示文摘Markar S R Blackburn S Cobb R 2012J Gastrointes- tinal Surg2012,16,:1
8Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children显示文摘Markar SR Blackburn S Cobb R 2012J Gastrointest Surg2012,16,10:1
9A meta -analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery显示文摘Markar SR Kutty R Edmonds L 2010Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg2010,10,2:1
10Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children显示文摘MARKAR SR BLACKBURN S COBB R 2012J Gastrointest Surg2012,16,10:1
11A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery 显示文摘Markar SR Kutty R Edmonds L 2010Interact Cardio Vasc Thorac Surg2010,10,2:1
12A Meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery显示文摘Markar SR Kutty R Edmonds L 2010Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2010,10,2:1
13Laparoscopic ver- sus open appendicectomy in obese patients显示文摘Markar S R Venkat Raman V Ho A 2011Int J Surg2011,9,6:1
14Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS)vs conventional multiport cholecystectomy:systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘Markar S R Karthikesalingam A Thrumurthy S 2012Surg Endosc2012,26,5:1
15The role of integrated F- 18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management显示文摘Vyas S Markar S R Iordanidou L 2011J Gastrointest Surg2011,15,12:1
16A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery显示文摘Markar SR Kutty R Edmonds L 2010Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2010,10,2:1
17Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children 显示文摘Markar SR Blackburn S Cobb R 2012J Gastrointest Surg2012,16,10:1
18A meta-analysis of minimally in- vasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery 显示文摘Markar SR Kutty R Edmonds L 2010Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2010,10,2:1
19Synovial sarcoma of the temporomandibular joint显示文摘White R D Markar J Steckler R M 1992J Oral Maxillofac Surg1992,50,11:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费