|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History显示文摘 | Joyce Berg John Dickhaut Kevin McCabe | 1995 | Games and Economic Behavior1995，，1： | 2 |
| 2 | Behavioral foundations of reciprocity : experimental economics and evolutionary psychology显示文摘 | Hoffman Elizabeth Kevin McCabe and Vernon Smith | 1998 | Economic Inquiry1998，，36： | 1 |
| 3 | Neuronal Substrates for Choice Under Ambiguity,Risk,Gains,and Losses显示文摘 | Smith Kip John Dickhaut Kevin McCabe Jose V.Pardo | | 0，，6： | 1 |
| 4 | Trust,Reciprocity and Social History显示文摘 | Jiyce Dickhaut John &McCabe Kevin | 1995 | Game and Economic Behavior1995，10，： | 1 |
| 5 | 'Trust,Reciprocity and Social History' 显示文摘 | Berg Joyce John Dickhaut Kevin McCabe | 1995 | Games and Economic Behavior1995，，5： | 1 |
| 6 | Avoiding competence substitution through knowledge sharing显示文摘 | Susan K Mcevily Shobha Das Kevin Mccabe | 2000 | Academy of Management Review2000，25，2： | 1 |
| 7 | Trust,Reciprocity,and Social history显示文摘 | Berg Joyce Dickhaut John Mccabe Kevin | 1995 | Games and Economic Behavior1995，10，1： | 1 |
| 8 | Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game显示文摘 | Terence Burnham Kevin McCabe Vernon L Smith | 2000 | Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization2000，，1： | 1 |
| 9 | Neuronal Substrates for Choice under Ambiguity, Risk, Gains, and Losses显示文摘 | KIP SMITH AND JOHN DICKHAUT AND KEVIN MCCABE AND JOS6 V PARDO | 2002 | Management Science2002，48，6： | 1 |
| 10 | On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games显示文摘 | Elizabeth Hoffman Kevin A. McCabe Vernon L. Smith | 1996 | International Journal of Game Theory1996，，3： | 1 |
| 11 | Advanced Syngas Upgrading Process for Conversion of Low-Rank Coals to Liquid Fuels显示文摘 | Andrew Lucero Amit Goyal Kevin McCabe Gerald Choi Haoren Lu Santosh Gangwal | 2016 | Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering2016，4，5： | 0 |
| 12 | Integrating the ISO 14034 standard as a platform for carbon capture and utilization technology performance evaluation显示文摘Independent testing and verification of emerging technologies are vital parts of the technology-commercialization process.With the rapid development of carbon capture and utilization(CCU)technologies,where existing standards and certifications do not exist,independent verification approaches and guidelines can provide a means to obtain credible information for an emerging market.The ISO 14034:2016-Environmental Management:Environmental Technology Verification(ETV)standard can serve as a foundational platform to ensure the consistency,quality and credibility of data on CCU technology performance,enabling direct comparisons between technologies and reducing risk to decision-makers regarding potential investment,future deployment and ultimate impacts of CCU innovations.Applying the fundamental principles of ISO 14034 to the evaluation of nine finalist CCU technologies competing in the NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE ensured that data used to evaluate competitors was of high quality,consistent across technologies and met the information needs of the XPRIZE and competition judges responsible for selecting winners.The approaches outlined here,including verification parameters and verification tasks for both XPRIZE-specific technology evaluations and full CCU technology evaluation by an accredited entity in conformance with the ISO 14034 standard,provide insight into the potential benefits-methodological consistency,high-quality data,independent oversight,methodological flexibility and broad applicability-and limitations-technology readiness and applicability,verification and instrumentation costs and lack of specificity-of the approach in an application for the evaluation of emerging technologies.Further application of the ISO 14034 standard and principles,developed through a consensus approach that incorporates other developing guidelines,can drive consistency and credibility for technology-performance evaluations across the CCU sector,ultimately leading to reduced risk and improved market access for new innovations. | Tim Hansen Kevin McCabe Bill Chatterton Michael Leitch | 2021 | Clean Energy2021，5，4： | 0 |
| 13 | Best practices for measurement and impact on performance evaluation for novel carbon-utilization process technologies显示文摘The NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE-a$20 million prize competition focused on the development and scaling of innovative carbon-capture and-utilization technologies-placed credible data at the forefront of its scoring and ranking approach for the selection of prize-winners.To guarantee the quality of the submitted data,independent third-party verifiers reviewed each candidate technology and data set.While the Carbon XPRIZE contenders demonstrated a variety of CO_(2)-utilization technologies at various levels of technical maturity and scale,it was found that early evaluation of the impact of measurements on process performance parameters via sensitivity analysis should influence the selection of instruments that have appropriate accuracy.In addition to appropriate accuracy,this assessment can lead to reduced costs associated with instrumentation rather than simply buying the‘best’instrument while simultaneously ensuring that uncertainties are kept as low as possible.With proper pre-planning,good engineering practice and good measurement practice,it is possible to optimize uncertainty against the costs and usability of instrumentation and data systems. | Tim Hansen Kevin McCabe Bill Chatterton Michael Leitch Patrick Woolcock | 2021 | Clean Energy2021，5，4： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员