维普中文期刊产品整合服务
5篇 您的检索式:作者名="Heurtebise"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis confirms Ostreidae classification显示文摘Danic-Tchaleu G Heurtebise S Morga B 0,,01:1
2Differentia- tion between population of the Portuguese oyster, Crassostrea angulata(Lamark)and the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg), revealed by mtDNA RFLP analysis显示文摘Boudry P S Heurtebise S Collet B 1998J Exp Mar Biol Eco1998,226,:1
3QTL for resistance to summer mortality and OsHV-1 load in the Pacific oyster(Crassostrea gigas)显示文摘Sauvage C Boudry P de Koning D J Haley C S Heurtebise S Lapegue S 0,,4:1
4Kant's,Hegel's and Cousin's Perceptions of China and Non-European Cultures:Racialism,Historicism and Universalism,and the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy显示文摘The aim of this paper is to discuss some assumptions of comparative philosophy by providing a critical analysis of Hegel's perception of China and other non-European cultures in relation to Kant's anthropological works.The main assumption of comparative philosophy is that the temporal-cognitive distance between Plato and Diderot is irrelevant compared to the geographic-cultural distance between Plato and Confucius or Diderot and Dai Zhen.This paper will demonstrate that this culturalist assumption is also a legacy of Hegel's history of philosophy,whose anthropological basis and historicist framework needs to be deconstructed.Finally,this paper will make reference to Victor Cousin,the French philosopher who introduced German philosophy in France,to show how this thinker's adaptation of Hegel's history of philosophy allows us to propose a more inclusive conception of the value of non-European cultures'intellectual productions and to elaborate,on this basis,a radically non-culturalist framework for comparative philosophy.Jean-Yves Heurtebise 2018Frontiers of Philosophy in China2018,13,4:0
5Is Heidegger an Orientalist or an Occidentalist European Philosopher?Disclosing the Political Factor behind Heidegger's Representation of Chinese Thinking显示文摘Though Heidegger became a kind of conceptual companion of comparative philosophers,and a methodological example for interpreters of Daoist philosophy claiming that Zhuangzi or Laozi embodied the overcoming of Western“onto-theology,”Heidegger himself not only stressed his disbelief in the notion that Asian thinking could save the West from its“civilizational crisis”but also clearly claimed that Western thinking could emerge only through its distinction from the“mythical East.”However,at the same time,Heidegger criticized the decadence of the West,claimed the necessity of cultural rejuvenation,and then,with the failure of Germany to perform this task,seemed to turn to Chinese sources to find alternative solutions.How to understand Heidegger’s complex relationship with China?Is Heidegger an Orientalist or an Occidentalist European philosopher?Moreover,how to understand the subtle and troubling connections between Heidegger’s complex relationship with China and Heidegger’s highly“problematic”(to say the least)intellectual engagement with Nazi ideology?To what extent are Orientalism and Occidentalism are linked to Heidegger’s belief in the Nationalist-Socialists’claims about“saving”the“European spirit”?Jean-Yves Heurtebise 2019Frontiers of Philosophy in China2019,14,4:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费