维普期刊资源整合服务平台（V6.5）

维普中文期刊产品整合服务

1篇 您的检索式：作者名="Botros S.M"

选中清除导出查看参考文献查看引证文献引用追踪共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

		题名	作者	年代	出处	被引量
	1	尿道中段悬吊带术与膀胱颈悬吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效比较显示文摘The objective of the study was to compare detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence rates after midurethral slings versus bladder neck slings. Study design: Three hundred forty subjects underwent midurethral slings or bladder neck slings. Comparisons were made using Student s t test and χ 2 test. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect confounding factors. Results: More patients in the midurethral sling group resolved detrusor overactivity than in the bladder neck sling group (38% versus 15% , P < .001). In addition, subjects in the midurethral sling group had significantly lower rates of de novo detrusor overactivity than subjects in the bladder neck sling group (29% versus 62% , P = .002). The only significant predictors of postoperative detrusor overactivity were preoperative detrusor overactivity (P < .001) and sling type (P < .001). After adjusting for preoperative detrusor overactivity, bladder neck slings significantly increased the risk for persistent detrusor overactivity (odds ratio 3.9). Conclusion: Midurethral slings have increased rates of resolution of detrusor overactivity and lower rates of de novo detrusor overactivity than transvaginal bladder neck sling procedures.	Botros S.M Abramov Y Goldberg R.P 朱国栋	2006	世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)2006，0，5：	0

返回顶部每页显示：

共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

goolge学术搜索-维普

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1　渝公网安备 50019002500403号　违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证新出网证(渝)字10号全国400电话 - 免长途话费