维普中文期刊产品整合服务

Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for generalised anxiety disorder: A metaanalysis

查看全文 作　　者：Huiru [1]Cui;Lijuan [1]Jiang;Yanyan [1]Wei;Wei [1]Li;Hui [1]Li;Junjuan [1]Zhu;Jiaoyan [2]Pang;Jijun [1,3,4]Wang;Chunbo [1,3,4,5]Li 高影响力作者 机构地区：[1]Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders,Shanghai Mental Health Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai,China;[2]School of government,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,China;[3]Institute of Psychology and Behavioral Science,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai,China;[4]Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology(CEBSIT),Chinese Academy of Science,Shanghai,China;[5]Brain Science and Technology Research Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai,China高影响力机构 出　　处：《General Psychiatry》索引2019年第32卷第5期,共12页高影响力期刊 基　　金：Shanghai Science and Technology Committee(18411952400,19411968600,16411965000);Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation(18ZR1432600);Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Foundation(20164Y0215,20174Y0021);SHSMU-ION Research Centre for Brain Disorders(2015NKX004). 摘　　要：Background Pharmacological and conventional nonpharmacological treatments are only moderately effective in treatingeneralised anxiety disorder(GAD).Recently,repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)has attracted interest because of its potential therapeutic value.Aim To investigate the efficacy and safety of rTMS treatment for GAD.Methods Literature studies published in English or Chinese were screened in 10 electronic databases up to 5 December 2018.The included studies'bias risk was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.Meta-analysis was performed to compute the standardised mean difference(SMD)and risk ratio(RR)along with its 95%Cis through using RevMan V.5.3.Heterogeneity was inspected by I2 and the χ2 test.We performed subgroup analysis and meta-regression to investigate heterogeneity.We used funnel plot to assess publication bias.We used the GRADE approach to assess the whole quality of evidence.Results Twenty-one studies,with a total sample size of 1481,were analysed.The risk of bias in most studies included is moderate,the majority of which are lacking of blinding methods of treatment allocation.The treatment had beneficial effects in the rTMS group compared with the control group in mean anxiety score(SMD=-0.68;95%Cl-0.89 to-0.46).None of the 21 studies included here reported severe adverse events.As for dropout rates,there are no statistically significant differences between the two groups(RR 1.14,95%Cl 0.72 to 1.82)or adverse events(RR 0.95,95%Cl 0.77 to 1.18).No particular influence on the heterogeneity of any variable was observed.The risk of publication bias was low.According to the GRADE approach,the evidence levels of primary outcome(treatment effects)and secondary outcomes(acceptability and safety)were rated as‘medium’.Conclusion The use of rTMS combined with medication treatment may have a significant positive anti-anxiety effect on patients with GAD.However,we should interpret the results cautiously due to the relatively high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis.Future high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm our results. 关 键 词：STIMULATION TREATMENT MAGNETIC
相关文献

参考文献(54)

引证文献(8)

耦合文献(166)

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1　渝公网安备 50019002500403号　违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费